Triple

T34889089
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Federalist No. 40 E1006232 entity
Predicate hasNumberingStyle P181640 FINISHED
Object Roman numerals LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Roman numerals | Statement: [Federalist No. 40, hasNumberingStyle, Roman numerals]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNumberingStyle
Context triple: [Federalist No. 40, hasNumberingStyle, Roman numerals]
  • A. hasNumberingRole
    Indicates that an entity holds a specific role or responsibility related to assigning, managing, or using numbers within a given context.
  • B. hasNumberingWithin
    Indicates that one entity assigns or follows a specific numbering scheme within the scope or structure of another entity.
  • C. hasNumberingFormat chosen
    Indicates that an entity uses or is associated with a particular scheme or style for numbering items, elements, or positions.
  • D. hasNumberingIncrement
    Indicates that one entity specifies the step size or increment used when numbering another entity in a sequence.
  • E. hasCategoryNumbering
    Indicates that an entity is assigned or associated with a specific category-based numbering or index within a classification system.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dbedb288190afe5780710847410 completed May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fec4cffed08190b5e5e7cc0c87493e completed May 9, 2026, 5:23 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fec2ea7fe08190bd751b39515f69d1 completed May 9, 2026, 5:15 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.