Triple
T34883847
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Dust |
E1006084
|
entity |
| Predicate | canCommunicateVia |
P43020
|
FINISHED |
| Object | alethiometer |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: alethiometer | Statement: [Dust, canCommunicateVia, alethiometer]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canCommunicateVia Context triple: [Dust, canCommunicateVia, alethiometer]
-
A.
hasCommunicationAccess
Indicates that one entity is able to communicate with, or use a communication channel or service provided by, another entity.
-
B.
usedToCommunicate
Indicates that one entity serves as a medium or tool through which another entity conveys information, messages, or signals.
-
C.
enablesCommunicationWith
Indicates that one entity provides the means or capability for another entity to communicate with a specified party or system.
-
D.
communicationCapability
chosen
Indicates that one entity has the ability or means to communicate with another entity through some channel or modality.
-
E.
canLiaiseWith
Indicates that one entity is able or permitted to communicate and coordinate directly with another entity for collaboration or information exchange.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dbedb288190afe5780710847410 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f782f4f10081908f97f6d0d2dbeec7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f780ff71cc8190a67e71076fbad81a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.