Triple
T34883420
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 1970 United States Senate campaign in Michigan |
E1006073
|
entity |
| Predicate | outcomeForPhilipHart |
P182090
|
FINISHED |
| Object | re-election |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: re-election | Statement: [1970 United States Senate campaign in Michigan, outcomeForPhilipHart, re-election]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: outcomeForPhilipHart Context triple: [1970 United States Senate campaign in Michigan, outcomeForPhilipHart, re-election]
-
A.
laterJudgedByStevens
Indicates that the subject was subsequently evaluated, ruled on, or otherwise formally judged by an individual or authority named Stevens.
-
B.
supremeCourtHolding
Indicates that a decision or legal principle has been formally established by a supreme court as the authoritative resolution of a legal issue.
-
C.
workedAsJudgeOn
Indicates that a person served in the role of a judge in connection with a particular case, court, or judicial proceeding.
-
D.
hadStateJudge
Indicates that a particular state-level judge presided over, ruled on, or was otherwise officially responsible for a given legal case or judicial matter.
-
E.
SupremeCourtVote
Indicates the voting decision or stance taken by a justice (or justices) in a case before the Supreme Court.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dbedb288190afe5780710847410 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f78710282c81909146dc0be91e983f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f784162134819098413482ef52042f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:21 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f7870dfe108190996c0c68630edc7f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:34 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.