Triple
T34863114
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Mahdi |
E1004933
|
entity |
| Predicate | willReappearAccordingTo |
P181935
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Twelver Shia belief |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Twelver Shia belief | Statement: [Mahdi, willReappearAccordingTo, Twelver Shia belief]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: willReappearAccordingTo Context triple: [Mahdi, willReappearAccordingTo, Twelver Shia belief]
-
A.
reappearsAt
Indicates that an entity, after having disappeared or been absent, becomes present again at a specific location or point in time.
-
B.
reappearsIn
Indicates that an entity that previously appeared becomes present or visible again in the same or another context.
-
C.
mayAppear
Indicates that an entity is allowed or has the possibility to be present or occur in association with another entity or context.
-
D.
appearTo
Indicates that something gives the impression or seems to be a certain way to an observer, without confirming that it actually is so.
-
E.
appearsFrom
Indicates that one entity becomes visible or emerges originating from another entity or location.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dbb678081909a247b9b5e1a73ac |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f782f4f10081908f97f6d0d2dbeec7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f780ff71cc8190a67e71076fbad81a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f782f416c081908bdd9b1ad456f0e2 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.