Triple
T34860170
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tom Simson |
E1004844
|
entity |
| Predicate | hadMoneyReturnedBy |
P11352
|
FINISHED |
| Object | John Oakhurst |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: John Oakhurst | Statement: [Tom Simson, hadMoneyReturnedBy, John Oakhurst]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hadMoneyReturnedBy Context triple: [Tom Simson, hadMoneyReturnedBy, John Oakhurst]
-
A.
wasReturnedTo
Indicates that an entity was sent or brought back to a previous owner, location, or state after having been away or removed.
-
B.
returnedBy
chosen
Indicates that something is given, sent, or brought back to a previous sender, owner, or source by another entity.
-
C.
returnedFor
Indicates that an entity has been sent, given, or brought back in response to, or on behalf of, another entity or prior action.
-
D.
returnedWith
Indicates that an entity came back or was brought back accompanied by, or in possession of, another specified entity.
-
E.
previouslyReturned
Indicates that an entity has been returned at some earlier time prior to the current reference point.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76dbb678081909a247b9b5e1a73ac |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f782f4f10081908f97f6d0d2dbeec7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f780ff71cc8190a67e71076fbad81a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.