Triple
T34845452
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Cecil Mountford |
E1004451
|
entity |
| Predicate | heritageNumberAtWigan |
P48054
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 448 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 448 | Statement: [Cecil Mountford, heritageNumberAtWigan, 448]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: heritageNumberAtWigan Context triple: [Cecil Mountford, heritageNumberAtWigan, 448]
-
A.
heritageDesignationNumber
Indicates the specific official identification number assigned to an entity as part of its heritage or cultural protection designation.
-
B.
heritageId
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the heritage identifier or heritage reference code associated with another entity.
-
C.
heritageSymbolOf
Indicates that something serves as a cultural or historical emblem representing the heritage or identity of a particular group, place, or tradition.
-
D.
heritageDesignation
Indicates that an entity has been formally assigned a specific cultural, historical, or heritage protection status by an authority.
-
E.
heritageReference
Indicates that one entity serves as a cultural, historical, or heritage-related reference or source for another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76db97714819099b5bed36fd64e9d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:46 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd02680d948190a3463fb119ba8556 |
completed | May 7, 2026, 9:21 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fcf89c69b4819082bbc564bd15137d |
completed | May 7, 2026, 8:39 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.