Triple
T34819371
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Tariff of 1842 |
E1003724
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasSuccessorPolicy |
P147537
|
FINISHED |
| Object | revenue-oriented Walker Tariff of 1846 |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: revenue-oriented Walker Tariff of 1846 | Statement: [Tariff of 1842, hasSuccessorPolicy, revenue-oriented Walker Tariff of 1846]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasSuccessorPolicy Context triple: [Tariff of 1842, hasSuccessorPolicy, revenue-oriented Walker Tariff of 1846]
-
A.
hasSuccessors
Indicates that an entity is followed or replaced by one or more subsequent entities in a sequence, process, or lineage.
-
B.
successorInPolicy
chosen
Indicates that one policy directly follows and replaces another in a sequence or hierarchy of policies.
-
C.
hasOnlineSuccessor
Indicates that one entity is the direct online or digital successor of another, typically replacing or continuing its function in an online context.
-
D.
hasSuccessorScheme
Indicates that one scheme is the direct successor or follow-up to another scheme in a sequence or versioning relationship.
-
E.
hasCurrentSuccessor
Indicates that one entity is the immediate next or following entity in a current, ordered sequence or progression of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76db717088190811b4e744610f37d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ffa9677be08190852c8ef6c2545fed |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:38 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ffa6570e2c8190a9d7b37f12b91d9a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 9:25 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 4 p.m.