Triple

T34795359
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject R v Penguin Books Ltd E1003061 entity
Predicate concernedWorkAuthor P129784 FINISHED
Object D. H. Lawrence NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: D. H. Lawrence | Statement: [R v Penguin Books Ltd, concernedWorkAuthor, D. H. Lawrence]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: concernedWorkAuthor
Context triple: [R v Penguin Books Ltd, concernedWorkAuthor, D. H. Lawrence]
  • A. basedOnWorkAuthorAssociatedWith
    Indicates that one entity is derived from or related to a work whose author is associated with another specified entity.
  • B. centralWorkAuthor
    Indicates that an author is the primary creator or main writer responsible for a central or key work.
  • C. associatedWithAuthorWork
    Indicates a relationship where an author is connected to a work they created, contributed to, or are otherwise credited for.
  • D. subjectOfWorkBy chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the main topic or focus of a work (such as a book, article, or artwork) created by another entity.
  • E. associatedWithWorkOf
    Indicates that one entity has a connection or involvement with the work, creation, or output produced by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76db543808190b188c6c86a91491b completed May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7aa699d68819081ed363931894ab3 completed May 3, 2026, 8:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7a8cec6d48190bebfa884b2f938c0 completed May 3, 2026, 7:58 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.