Triple
T34795352
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | R v Penguin Books Ltd |
E1003061
|
entity |
| Predicate | prosecutingCounsel |
P57571
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Mervyn Griffith-Jones |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Mervyn Griffith-Jones | Statement: [R v Penguin Books Ltd, prosecutingCounsel, Mervyn Griffith-Jones]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: prosecutingCounsel Context triple: [R v Penguin Books Ltd, prosecutingCounsel, Mervyn Griffith-Jones]
-
A.
counselForProsecution
chosen
Indicates that an entity serves as a legal representative or advisor acting on behalf of the prosecution in a legal proceeding.
-
B.
prosecutingAuthority
Indicates that an entity serves as the official body responsible for bringing and conducting legal proceedings against another party in a criminal or regulatory case.
-
C.
prosecutorSought
Indicates that a prosecutor actively pursued or requested a particular legal action, charge, or outcome against a party.
-
D.
prosecuted
Indicates that legal authorities have formally brought criminal charges against an entity and pursued a case against them in a court of law.
-
E.
subsequentProsecutor
Indicates that one prosecutor follows or succeeds another in handling the same or a related legal case.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76db543808190b188c6c86a91491b |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f77a83ec9081909309bc3d646f193c |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:40 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7795b1abc8190823664d1caa94649 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:35 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.