Triple

T34795314
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sir Clifford Chatterley E1003060 entity
Predicate sexualRelationshipTo P181480 FINISHED
Object impotent with his wife LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: impotent with his wife | Statement: [Sir Clifford Chatterley, sexualRelationshipTo, impotent with his wife]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: sexualRelationshipTo
Context triple: [Sir Clifford Chatterley, sexualRelationshipTo, impotent with his wife]
  • A. inRelationshipWith
    Indicates that two entities are mutually involved in a defined personal, romantic, or partnership relationship with each other.
  • B. worksInCloseRelationshipWith
    Indicates a collaborative professional relationship in which two or more entities work together closely and interact frequently to achieve shared goals.
  • C. spouseOrLover
    Indicates a romantic partnership between two entities, whether formalized as a spouse or existing as a lover.
  • D. haveRelationshipWith
    Indicates that one entity is in some form of defined relationship or association with another entity.
  • E. relationshipToSpouse
    Indicates the specific familial or social role one person holds in relation to their spouse (e.g., husband, wife, partner).
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76db543808190b188c6c86a91491b completed May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f77ab085088190ace5734dcc9f1167 completed May 3, 2026, 4:41 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7795b1abc8190823664d1caa94649 completed May 3, 2026, 4:35 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f77a39135081908ae22d2a23b44e74 completed May 3, 2026, 4:39 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.