Triple

T34791575
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject The Engineer E1002960 entity
Predicate illustratedInCollectionBy P2761 FINISHED
Object E. H. Shepard NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: E. H. Shepard | Statement: [The Engineer, illustratedInCollectionBy, E. H. Shepard]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: illustratedInCollectionBy
Context triple: [The Engineer, illustratedInCollectionBy, E. H. Shepard]
  • A. displayedInCollection
    Indicates that an item is or was shown as part of a particular collection or exhibition grouping.
  • B. hasIllustrationsBy chosen
    Indicates that one entity (such as a work or publication) includes illustrations that were created by another entity (the illustrator).
  • C. hasNotableIllustrationsOf
    Indicates that something contains or features particularly significant or noteworthy illustrations depicting another entity or subject.
  • D. illustratorOfOriginalCollection
    Indicates that an entity served as the illustrator for the original version of a collection of works.
  • E. appearsInWorkOfArt
    Indicates that an entity is depicted, represented, or otherwise featured within a particular work of art.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76db47d408190a24fc7164439ea2d completed May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f782f4f10081908f97f6d0d2dbeec7 completed May 3, 2026, 5:16 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f780ff71cc8190a67e71076fbad81a completed May 3, 2026, 5:08 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.