Triple
T34791202
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Ashdown Forest |
E1002948
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasIllustratorAssociation |
P158166
|
FINISHED |
| Object | E. H. Shepard |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: E. H. Shepard | Statement: [Ashdown Forest, hasIllustratorAssociation, E. H. Shepard]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasIllustratorAssociation Context triple: [Ashdown Forest, hasIllustratorAssociation, E. H. Shepard]
-
A.
hasIllustrationsBy
Indicates that one entity (such as a work or publication) includes illustrations that were created by another entity (the illustrator).
-
B.
illustratorOf
chosen
Indicates that one entity serves as the illustrator or creator of the visual artwork for another entity, such as a book, article, or other work.
-
C.
sameIllustratorAs
Indicates that two entities share the same illustrator, i.e., they were illustrated by the same person or creative source.
-
D.
hasIllustrations
Indicates that an entity includes or is accompanied by visual illustrations.
-
E.
hasArtisticAssociationWith
Indicates a relationship in which two entities are connected through shared, collaborative, or thematically related artistic work or influence.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76db47d408190a24fc7164439ea2d |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f77ffa6b68819090257fed3802c239 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:03 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f7795978c481909e152cd1bd02dd07 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 4:35 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.