Triple

T34783194
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Rumcajs E1002728 entity
Predicate basedInFolkloreStyle P131562 FINISHED
Object Czech folk tradition LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Czech folk tradition | Statement: [Rumcajs, basedInFolkloreStyle, Czech folk tradition]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: basedInFolkloreStyle
Context triple: [Rumcajs, basedInFolkloreStyle, Czech folk tradition]
  • A. folkloreFunction
    Indicates that something serves a role, purpose, or function within a body of folklore, such as myths, legends, or traditional narratives.
  • B. includesFolklore
    Indicates that one entity contains, incorporates, or features folklore as part of its content or composition.
  • C. countryOfFolklore chosen
    Indicates the country with which a particular piece or tradition of folklore is associated or from which it originates.
  • D. folkloreCharacter
    Indicates that one entity is a character originating from the traditional stories, myths, or legends associated with the other entity.
  • E. hasFolkloreStatus
    Indicates that something is recognized or classified as having a status or role within folklore or traditional cultural narratives.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76db47d408190a24fc7164439ea2d completed May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff109695008190a22b47ef8be2e3f9 completed May 9, 2026, 10:46 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff0f243ea88190970d2c520b55c816 completed May 9, 2026, 10:40 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.