Triple
T34781100
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Snake (poem) |
E1002662
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasNarratorEmotion |
P199136
|
FINISHED |
| Object | admiration for the snake |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: admiration for the snake | Statement: [Snake (poem), hasNarratorEmotion, admiration for the snake]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasNarratorEmotion Context triple: [Snake (poem), hasNarratorEmotion, admiration for the snake]
-
A.
hasNarratorGender
Indicates that a narrative work is associated with a narrator whose gender is specified.
-
B.
hasNarration
Indicates that an entity provides spoken or written commentary or storytelling for another entity, such as a work, event, or scene.
-
C.
hasCoNarrator
Indicates that two or more entities share the role of narrating the same work, event, or story together.
-
D.
hasLyricNarrator
Indicates that a musical or lyrical work is associated with a specific narrator who voices or presents its lyrics.
-
E.
narratorOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the narrator or storytelling voice for another entity, such as a text, story, or media work.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76db30a108190bb57ca95b873e5bb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff21cbd9108190a52c0ba42004c669 |
completed | May 9, 2026, noon |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff1faea91881908c626c70bca5100a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 11:51 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff21ca6964819088bdf1810b7863f2 |
completed | May 9, 2026, noon |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.