Triple

T34779044
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject New York Symphony E1002589 entity
Predicate hasFictionalCellist P62476 FINISHED
Object Sharon NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Sharon | Statement: [New York Symphony, hasFictionalCellist, Sharon]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFictionalCellist
Context triple: [New York Symphony, hasFictionalCellist, Sharon]
  • A. hasFictionalSong
    Indicates that one entity includes, features, or is associated with a song that is fictional or exists only within a narrative context.
  • B. isFictionalCharacter
    Indicates that the subject is a character that exists only in fiction rather than in real life.
  • C. isFictionalSong
    Indicates that the referenced song exists only in fiction (e.g., within a story, film, game, or other fictional context) and not as a real-world musical work.
  • D. hasFictionalPerformer chosen
    Indicates that an entity is associated with a performer who is a fictional or imaginary character rather than a real person.
  • E. hasFictionalSpeaker
    Indicates that a work, text, or expression is presented as being spoken by an invented or non-real speaker rather than an actual person.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76db30a108190bb57ca95b873e5bb completed May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff9b1ad27081908f8a492396950795 completed May 9, 2026, 8:37 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff9a6354c48190ae21070c1424cb7a completed May 9, 2026, 8:34 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.