Triple
T34775929
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | McMinnville UFO photographs |
E1002505
|
entity |
| Predicate | takenInCounty |
P23957
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Yamhill County, Oregon |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Yamhill County, Oregon | Statement: [McMinnville UFO photographs, takenInCounty, Yamhill County, Oregon]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: takenInCounty Context triple: [McMinnville UFO photographs, takenInCounty, Yamhill County, Oregon]
-
A.
inCounty
chosen
Indicates that one entity is geographically or administratively located within the boundaries of a specified county.
-
B.
includesCounty
Indicates that a larger geographic or administrative region contains or encompasses a specific county within its boundaries.
-
C.
isInCountySeatOf
Indicates that one entity is located within the town or city that serves as the administrative center (county seat) of a specified county.
-
D.
hasRankInCounty
Indicates that an entity holds a specific rank or position within the administrative boundaries of a particular county.
-
E.
isOnlyInCounty
Indicates that an entity exists or occurs exclusively within a single specified county and not in any other county.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f76db30a108190bb57ca95b873e5bb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f782f4f10081908f97f6d0d2dbeec7 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f780ff71cc8190a67e71076fbad81a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 5:08 p.m. |
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.