Triple

T34769915
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject MOEX Offshore 2007 E1002334 entity
Predicate liabilityContext P181596 FINISHED
Object environmental damage claims LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: environmental damage claims | Statement: [MOEX Offshore 2007, liabilityContext, environmental damage claims]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: liabilityContext
Context triple: [MOEX Offshore 2007, liabilityContext, environmental damage claims]
  • A. liabilityType
    Indicates the specific category or nature of liability associated with an entity, obligation, or financial exposure.
  • B. establishesLiabilityFor
    Indicates that one party is held legally responsible or accountable for a particular act, omission, or outcome.
  • C. modeOfLiability
    Indicates the specific legal basis or manner in which an entity is held responsible for an act or outcome.
  • D. safetyContext
    Indicates the circumstances, conditions, or environment that affect how safe an action, object, or situation is.
  • E. legalContext
    Indicates that the relationship or action occurs within, is shaped by, or is relevant to a specific legal framework, proceeding, or set of legal norms.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76db20dac8190b1e8d0ca4dc1d59f completed May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f77ffa6b68819090257fed3802c239 completed May 3, 2026, 5:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f7795978c481909e152cd1bd02dd07 completed May 3, 2026, 4:35 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f77ff804f08190b431a31e6179ace4 completed May 3, 2026, 5:03 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.