Triple

T34763968
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Christian Democratic Union (East Germany) E1002146 entity
Predicate laterSupportedPolicy P201993 FINISHED
Object German reunification (1989–1990) NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: German reunification (1989–1990) | Statement: [Christian Democratic Union (East Germany), laterSupportedPolicy, German reunification (1989–1990)]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: laterSupportedPolicy
Context triple: [Christian Democratic Union (East Germany), laterSupportedPolicy, German reunification (1989–1990)]
  • A. laterPolicy
    Indicates that one policy occurs or becomes effective after another policy in time.
  • B. supportsPolicy
    Indicates that one entity endorses, backs, or is in favor of a particular policy or set of policies.
  • C. previouslySupported
    Indicates that an entity provided support to another entity at some time in the past, but not necessarily in the present.
  • D. hasPolicySupport
    Indicates that one entity provides endorsement, backing, or approval for a specific policy associated with another entity.
  • E. laterSupportsClaimOf
    Indicates that one statement or piece of evidence, appearing later in time or sequence, provides support for the validity or truth of an earlier claim.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76db20dac8190b1e8d0ca4dc1d59f completed May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a0041860fd081908623ef9fd40a9775 completed May 10, 2026, 8:27 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a00414b01488190a312adb3b25d69cf completed May 10, 2026, 8:26 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a00418517008190b33399a08a003ee2 completed May 10, 2026, 8:27 a.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.