Triple

T34751588
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Sokołów Podlaski E1001795 entity
Predicate historicalCommonwealth P202448 FINISHED
Object Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth | Statement: [Sokołów Podlaski, historicalCommonwealth, Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: historicalCommonwealth
Context triple: [Sokołów Podlaski, historicalCommonwealth, Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth]
  • A. hasSharedColonialHistory
    Indicates that the related entities were subject to, or part of, the same colonial power or colonial system during a historical period.
  • B. hasColonialHistoryWith
    Indicates that one entity has a historical relationship of colonization or being colonized involving the other entity.
  • C. previousColonialInvolvement
    Indicates that one entity had a colonial role or presence in another entity at some time in the past.
  • D. colonialHistoryIncludes
    Indicates that one entity’s colonial history encompasses, involves, or includes the other entity as part of its colonial past.
  • E. hasColonialHistory
    Indicates that an entity has experienced or participated in a period of colonial rule, control, or administration in relation to another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76db0367081909b57c50a7fb03025 completed May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_6a008098e5dc8190b7ccad8bab780343 completed May 10, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_6a008037267c8190990225a6ff0b3694 completed May 10, 2026, 12:55 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_6a00809836f081908de40255d4f4d525 completed May 10, 2026, 12:56 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.