Triple

T34729959
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject General Officer Commanding III Corps E1001179 entity
Predicate holderConflict P181807 FINISHED
Object World War II operations LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: World War II operations | Statement: [General Officer Commanding III Corps, holderConflict, World War II operations]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: holderConflict
Context triple: [General Officer Commanding III Corps, holderConflict, World War II operations]
  • A. valueConflict
    Indicates a situation where two or more values, preferences, or principles are in opposition or cannot be simultaneously satisfied.
  • B. endedConflict
    Indicates that a previously ongoing conflict between entities has been brought to an end.
  • C. mentionsConflict
    Indicates that one entity refers to or discusses a dispute, disagreement, or conflict involving another entity.
  • D. reportedConflict
    Indicates that one party has formally reported the existence of a conflict involving another party or situation.
  • E. captureConflict
    Indicates that one entity records, represents, or encapsulates a conflict involving another entity or between multiple entities.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76daeb6e48190a4c9a6b0edc80f72 completed May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7824dc3f0819092a5102895b4a478 completed May 3, 2026, 5:13 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f780fc5ed88190b7200ee5a29940af completed May 3, 2026, 5:08 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f7817c79e081908e685c48165e086b completed May 3, 2026, 5:10 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.