Triple

T34704441
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Agra–Jaipur route E1000461 entity
Predicate connectsWithOtherRouteAt P155912 FINISHED
Object Achhnera Junction NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Achhnera Junction | Statement: [Agra–Jaipur route, connectsWithOtherRouteAt, Achhnera Junction]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: connectsWithOtherRouteAt
Context triple: [Agra–Jaipur route, connectsWithOtherRouteAt, Achhnera Junction]
  • A. connectedRoute chosen
    Indicates that there is a direct or logically continuous path linking two locations or segments within a network.
  • B. includesRouteBetween
    Indicates that one entity (such as a service, plan, or network) contains or provides a specific route connecting two locations or points.
  • C. connectsTo
    Indicates a relationship where one entity is linked or joined to another, allowing interaction, communication, or transfer between them.
  • D. isContiguousWithAnyRoute
    Indicates that an entity shares at least one continuous boundary or segment with any existing route.
  • E. connectedByStraitTo
    Indicates that one entity is geographically linked to another by a narrow body of water known as a strait.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f76dab937881909c86f1b9ad50445f completed May 3, 2026, 3:45 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff65987ff88190b09be64f7c0e1da9 completed May 9, 2026, 4:49 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff6525b0548190bef7a9f009e00bb8 completed May 9, 2026, 4:47 p.m.
Created at: May 3, 2026, 3:59 p.m.