Triple
T34695278
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Concord industrial area |
E891010
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasZoningDesignation |
P9954
|
FINISHED |
| Object | industrial zoning |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: industrial zoning | Statement: [Concord industrial area, hasZoningDesignation, industrial zoning]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasZoningDesignation Context triple: [Concord industrial area, hasZoningDesignation, industrial zoning]
-
A.
hasDevelopmentDesignation
Indicates that an entity is assigned a specific development-related status, category, or designation within a development process or framework.
-
B.
hasZoningRestriction
Indicates that an entity is subject to a specific zoning-related limitation or regulatory constraint.
-
C.
cityPlanningDesignation
chosen
Indicates how an area is officially classified or designated within urban or municipal planning (e.g., residential, commercial, industrial).
-
D.
hasRegionDesignation
Indicates that an entity is assigned or associated with a specific regional classification or designation.
-
E.
hasZoningPolicy
Indicates that a governing body or authority has established or adopted a specific zoning policy that regulates land use or development within its jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349db7ab8819086808e833f472871 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f72355ca348190b25b3479bccca922 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72157af108190880317a62e634bb0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:20 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:05 a.m.