Triple
T34677852
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | People's democracy in Czechoslovakia |
E890539
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalOpposition |
P199544
|
FINISHED |
| Object | none (banned opposition parties) |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: none (banned opposition parties) | Statement: [People's democracy in Czechoslovakia, legalOpposition, none (banned opposition parties)]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalOpposition Context triple: [People's democracy in Czechoslovakia, legalOpposition, none (banned opposition parties)]
-
A.
legalStatusOfOpposition
chosen
Indicates the current legal status or outcome of a formal opposition (such as a challenge or objection) in a legal or administrative process.
-
B.
legalRepresentation
Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
-
C.
legalView
Indicates that one entity holds or expresses a legal opinion, interpretation, or judgment about another entity or situation.
-
D.
opposedLawType
Indicates that one law is opposed to, or in conflict with, another law of a specified type.
-
E.
legalCase
Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349dabc008190a18999c26682ed47 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff7595c9bc8190982c6e6e07a0c78f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:57 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff715432a88190a25670d26614bde2 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:39 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:05 a.m.