Triple
T34674136
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Lax–Wendroff method |
E890451
|
entity |
| Predicate | usesIdea |
P134911
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Taylor expansion in time with spatial derivatives |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Taylor expansion in time with spatial derivatives | Statement: [Lax–Wendroff method, usesIdea, Taylor expansion in time with spatial derivatives]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesIdea Context triple: [Lax–Wendroff method, usesIdea, Taylor expansion in time with spatial derivatives]
-
A.
hasIdea
Indicates that an entity possesses, holds, or originates a particular idea.
-
B.
coreIdea
Indicates the central concept or primary message that underlies or unifies something, such as a text, argument, or work.
-
C.
associatedIdea
chosen
Indicates that one entity is conceptually linked or related to another as an idea, theme, or notion.
-
D.
hasAuthorIdea
Indicates that an author is associated with or responsible for originating a particular idea.
-
E.
hasBrightIdea
Indicates that an entity conceives or possesses a clever, insightful, or innovative idea.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349d9c59481908b36baa0be093aea |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f72322256c8190afb14d73a2612b6f |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:27 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72157af108190880317a62e634bb0 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:20 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:05 a.m.