Triple

T34660630
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Hazzard County, Georgia E890095 entity
Predicate hasFictionalDeputy P174893 FINISHED
Object Enos Strate NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Enos Strate | Statement: [Hazzard County, Georgia, hasFictionalDeputy, Enos Strate]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasFictionalDeputy
Context triple: [Hazzard County, Georgia, hasFictionalDeputy, Enos Strate]
  • A. deputyOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as the subordinate or second-in-command to another, acting with delegated authority on their behalf.
  • B. hasFictionalOffice
    Indicates that one entity maintains or is associated with an office or workplace that exists only in a fictional or imaginary context.
  • C. mayHaveDeputy
    Indicates that an entity is allowed or entitled to have another entity serving as its deputy or subordinate representative.
  • D. isFictionalAgentOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity is a fictional character or agent that acts on behalf of, or represents, another entity.
  • E. wasDeputyIn
    Indicates that an entity served in the role of deputy within a specified organization, office, or jurisdiction during a particular period.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349d906bc8190b2efd9eff237d94b completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69ff8ba3f8248190bbdf8e7ec2b35093 completed May 9, 2026, 7:31 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69ff8b41ba988190a7332e8317d10f09 completed May 9, 2026, 7:30 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:04 a.m.