Triple

T34660508
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Good Ol' Boys E890092 entity
Predicate hasLyricReferenceTo P114550 FINISHED
Object The Dukes of Hazzard characters LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The Dukes of Hazzard characters | Statement: [Good Ol' Boys, hasLyricReferenceTo, The Dukes of Hazzard characters]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasLyricReferenceTo
Context triple: [Good Ol' Boys, hasLyricReferenceTo, The Dukes of Hazzard characters]
  • A. hasLyricsIn
    Indicates that the lyrics of a work are written or available in a specified language.
  • B. hasLyricsMentioning chosen
    Indicates that the referenced lyrics explicitly mention or refer to the specified entity.
  • C. lyricReference
    Indicates that one entity (typically a work or text) contains or makes a reference to the lyrics of another entity.
  • D. containsSongReferencing
    Indicates that one entity (such as a work, collection, or playlist) includes at least one song that makes an explicit reference to another specified entity.
  • E. hasLyric
    Indicates that one entity (typically a musical work or track) contains or is associated with the lyrics provided by another entity.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349d906bc8190b2efd9eff237d94b completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f727bde8f88190ad746ca515134ca1 completed May 3, 2026, 10:47 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f72739c30c81908642eef3feb3afcf completed May 3, 2026, 10:45 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:04 a.m.