Triple

T34645645
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Oxchuc E889686 entity
Predicate usesTraditionalAuthoritySelection P191036 FINISHED
Object yes LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: yes | Statement: [Oxchuc, usesTraditionalAuthoritySelection, yes]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: usesTraditionalAuthoritySelection
Context triple: [Oxchuc, usesTraditionalAuthoritySelection, yes]
  • A. usesTraditionalSystem
    Indicates that an entity operates according to or relies on a traditional, established system rather than a modern or alternative one.
  • B. usesTraditionalDecoration
    Indicates that an entity employs customary or historically established decorative styles or motifs in its design or presentation.
  • C. hasTraditionalRights
    Indicates that an entity possesses customary or historically established rights or privileges in relation to another entity or resource.
  • D. isTraditional
    Indicates that something adheres to long-established customs, practices, or norms rather than modern or innovative ones.
  • E. traditionalAuthorityOver
    Indicates that one entity holds customary or historically established power, control, or decision-making authority over another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349d825c88190bfc6170ac9281260 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fcd867f36081908c88c55a6a1404c1 completed May 7, 2026, 6:22 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fcd1f47b188190b4cf4b4c748d9d03 completed May 7, 2026, 5:55 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69fcd866dd248190bff61c43bee93f54 completed May 7, 2026, 6:22 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:04 a.m.