Triple
T34625620
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Maycomb County, Alabama |
E889126
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalSystemDepiction |
P56594
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Jim Crow–era legal system |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jim Crow–era legal system | Statement: [Maycomb County, Alabama, legalSystemDepiction, Jim Crow–era legal system]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalSystemDepiction Context triple: [Maycomb County, Alabama, legalSystemDepiction, Jim Crow–era legal system]
-
A.
legalSystemDepictedAs
chosen
Indicates that one entity portrays, represents, or characterizes a legal system in a particular way or form.
-
B.
legalSystem
Indicates the formal framework of laws, rules, and institutions that governs how legal matters are defined, interpreted, and enforced within a society or jurisdiction.
-
C.
legalSystemFeature
Indicates a characteristic, rule, or structural element that forms part of a particular legal system.
-
D.
legalSystemBasis
Indicates the foundational legal framework, tradition, or set of principles on which a legal system is based.
-
E.
legalSystematizationOf
Indicates the process or state in which laws, regulations, or legal principles are organized, codified, or structured into a coherent legal system or framework for something.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349d64a388190a013cfa9bd33fad7 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff6ef0d61c81909162d37c15a1a3c3 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:29 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff6c6a58e08190921317062cd9d489 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:18 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:04 a.m.