Triple
T34613497
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | ambiguity of photographic evidence |
E888800
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | concept in philosophy of photography |
C52285
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: concept in philosophy of photography Context triple: [ambiguity of photographic evidence, instanceOf, concept in philosophy of photography]
-
A.
photographic theory concept
chosen
A photographic theory concept is an abstract idea or framework used to analyze, interpret, and explain how photographs create meaning, represent reality, and influence viewers.
-
B.
concept in philosophy of technology
A concept in the philosophy of technology is an abstract idea or theoretical construct used to analyze, interpret, and critique the nature, development, and impact of technologies on human life and society.
-
C.
concept in analytic philosophy
In analytic philosophy, a concept is an abstract, mentally graspable unit of meaning that structures thought and language, enabling the classification, comparison, and analysis of objects, properties, and relations.
-
D.
concept in continental philosophy
A concept in continental philosophy is an abstract, historically and culturally situated idea or construct used to interpret, critique, and transform our understanding of experience, society, and reality.
-
E.
concept in dialogical philosophy
A concept in dialogical philosophy is an idea or meaning that emerges, evolves, and gains validity through the dynamic, reciprocal process of dialogue between interlocutors.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349d584e08190b40b9f6281ad50c4 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:03 a.m.