Triple
T34608665
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Subsequent Law Commissions of India |
E888662
|
entity |
| Predicate | legalStatusOfRecommendations |
P200029
|
FINISHED |
| Object | advisory |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: advisory | Statement: [Subsequent Law Commissions of India, legalStatusOfRecommendations, advisory]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: legalStatusOfRecommendations Context triple: [Subsequent Law Commissions of India, legalStatusOfRecommendations, advisory]
-
A.
legalStatusAffirmedIn
Indicates that an entity’s legal status has been formally confirmed or upheld within a specified legal jurisdiction, document, or proceeding.
-
B.
legalStatusAfterAssent
Indicates the legal status that an entity attains once formal assent or approval has been granted.
-
C.
legalStatusAtApproval
Indicates the legal status or classification an entity held at the time it was formally approved.
-
D.
legalStatusClarifiedBy
Indicates that the legal status of something is defined, explained, or resolved by a specific document, decision, or authoritative act.
-
E.
legalStatusOfClaims
Indicates the current legal standing or condition of specific claims within a legal or administrative context.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349d489d48190ba30e7d97c6f5ef9 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69ff6c061c6c81909ff485e9cafc88a2 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69ff6aaf886c8190a3c87d089453f3de |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:11 p.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69ff6c04fa208190b1fab40a71ef923f |
completed | May 9, 2026, 5:16 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:03 a.m.