Triple
T34608617
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Macaulay’s Draft Penal Code of 1837 |
E888661
|
entity |
| Predicate | typeOfCodification |
P2202
|
FINISHED |
| Object | comprehensive criminal code |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: comprehensive criminal code | Statement: [Macaulay’s Draft Penal Code of 1837, typeOfCodification, comprehensive criminal code]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: typeOfCodification Context triple: [Macaulay’s Draft Penal Code of 1837, typeOfCodification, comprehensive criminal code]
-
A.
labelCodeType
Indicates that one entity serves as the type or classification scheme for the labeling code applied to another entity.
-
B.
codeType
chosen
Indicates the classification or category assigned to a particular code within a coding or encoding system.
-
C.
codificationLevel
Indicates the degree or extent to which something is formally systematized, standardized, or encoded into an explicit set of rules or structures.
-
D.
typeOfCanonization
Indicates the specific form or category of canonization by which an entity was officially declared sacred or recognized as a saint.
-
E.
hasTypeOfNomenclature
Indicates that one entity is classified or designated according to a particular system or type of naming or nomenclature used by another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349d489d48190ba30e7d97c6f5ef9 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_6a0144c75aec81908bdd9e88f2af737a |
completed | May 11, 2026, 2:53 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_6a014405a2d48190a1d58b0b907ad696 |
completed | May 11, 2026, 2:50 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:03 a.m.