Triple
T34595176
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | stddef.h |
E888287
|
entity |
| Predicate | canBeIncludedWith |
P56284
|
FINISHED |
| Object | #include <stddef.h> |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: #include <stddef.h> | Statement: [stddef.h, canBeIncludedWith, #include <stddef.h>]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canBeIncludedWith Context triple: [stddef.h, canBeIncludedWith, #include <stddef.h>]
-
A.
canBeAddedTo
Indicates that one entity is capable of being combined or incorporated with another entity, typically without conflict or incompatibility.
-
B.
canCoexistWith
chosen
Indicates that two entities are able to exist together in the same context or environment without conflict, interference, or mutual exclusion.
-
C.
canAlsoBe
Indicates that something has an additional possible state, role, or classification beyond its primary one.
-
D.
collectionAlsoIncludes
Indicates that a collection contains, in addition to some already-specified items, one or more further items that are also part of that same collection.
-
E.
canBeHeldSeparatelyFrom
Indicates that one entity is capable of being physically or conceptually separated and held apart from another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349d3bfcc81909874c99e646fb3ea |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fea2d0a4d08190aa06aeb902a02d5a |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:58 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fea24698348190b9b992a8e7cdbcd0 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:03 a.m.