Triple
T34574804
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Toronto Argonauts–Hamilton Tiger-Cats rivalry |
E887720
|
entity |
| Predicate | chantAssociation |
P15355
|
FINISHED |
| Object | “Argos!” |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: “Argos!” | Statement: [Toronto Argonauts–Hamilton Tiger-Cats rivalry, chantAssociation, “Argos!”]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: chantAssociation Context triple: [Toronto Argonauts–Hamilton Tiger-Cats rivalry, chantAssociation, “Argos!”]
-
A.
chorus
Indicates that multiple entities jointly produce or participate in a coordinated vocal or expressive performance, typically as a unified group.
-
B.
musicalAssociation
Indicates a relationship where entities are connected through music, such as collaboration, influence, shared performance, or other musically relevant association.
-
C.
alsoChantedIn
Indicates that a chant, hymn, or recitation is performed or used in an additional context, location, or tradition beyond its primary one.
-
D.
hasChant
chosen
Indicates that an entity is associated with or characterized by a particular chant.
-
E.
clubRebrandedAs
Indicates that a sports club has changed its official name or identity to become another specified club.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349d1a5fc81908557a46875b2f157 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7209895288190ae44354012537e8e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:16 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71cc8074c81909ae09bea2acf1a09 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:03 a.m.