Triple

T34569551
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bachet Noir E887585 entity
Predicate isTraditionalVarietyOf P166199 FINISHED
Object Champagne region NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Champagne region | Statement: [Bachet Noir, isTraditionalVarietyOf, Champagne region]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: isTraditionalVarietyOf
Context triple: [Bachet Noir, isTraditionalVarietyOf, Champagne region]
  • A. isInlandVarietyOf
    Indicates that one entity is a variety or subtype of another that occurs specifically in inland (non-coastal) areas.
  • B. isTraditional
    Indicates that something adheres to long-established customs, practices, or norms rather than modern or innovative ones.
  • C. isRepresentativeVarietyOf
    Indicates that one entity serves as a typical or standard example representing the broader characteristics of another entity or group.
  • D. isPrimaryVarietyOf
    Indicates that one variety is the main or principal form of another related variety or entity.
  • E. isTraditionalFormOf chosen
    Indicates that one entity is the historically established or customary version from which another, typically more modern or variant, form is derived.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349d1a5fc81908557a46875b2f157 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f72092ea788190987ab862d8f10d95 completed May 3, 2026, 10:16 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f71cc8074c81909ae09bea2acf1a09 completed May 3, 2026, 10 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:02 a.m.