Triple

T34533325
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bose–Mesner algebra E886600 entity
Predicate hasDualBasis P179663 FINISHED
Object primitive idempotent basis LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: primitive idempotent basis | Statement: [Bose–Mesner algebra, hasDualBasis, primitive idempotent basis]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasDualBasis
Context triple: [Bose–Mesner algebra, hasDualBasis, primitive idempotent basis]
  • A. hasDualSpace
    Indicates that one mathematical space is the dual space consisting of all linear functionals defined on another space.
  • B. hasAlternativeBasis
    Indicates that something is supported, justified, or founded on a different underlying reason, source, or principle than the primary or original one.
  • C. hasBasisIn
    Indicates that one entity is founded, derived, or justified on the grounds of another entity.
  • D. hasStandardBasis
    Indicates that a given vector space is equipped with or possesses its usual canonical set of basis vectors.
  • E. haveDualityProperty
    Indicates that an entity possesses a characteristic or state that inherently consists of two complementary, contrasting, or coexisting aspects.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349cd7c148190aa99192b126d1527 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69f7238172748190b8cd340ad1f4ba80 completed May 3, 2026, 10:29 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69f72155c48881909bd40b9aa3febd5a completed May 3, 2026, 10:20 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69f72349f1108190b6a06758ab2f40bb completed May 3, 2026, 10:28 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:02 a.m.