Triple
T34529844
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Illinois Department of Human Rights |
E886504
|
entity |
| Predicate | submitsCasesTo |
P28
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Illinois Human Rights Commission |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Illinois Human Rights Commission | Statement: [Illinois Department of Human Rights, submitsCasesTo, Illinois Human Rights Commission]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: submitsCasesTo Context triple: [Illinois Department of Human Rights, submitsCasesTo, Illinois Human Rights Commission]
-
A.
canSubmitCasesTo
Indicates that one entity has the permission or capability to submit cases to another entity.
-
B.
submittedTo
chosen
Indicates that one entity has formally sent or presented something (such as a document, request, or work) to another entity for consideration, review, or processing.
-
C.
submitsRulesTo
Indicates that one party formally presents or delivers a set of rules to another party for consideration, approval, or application.
-
D.
subsequentCase
Indicates that one legal case follows another in time or procedural order, often relying on or referencing the earlier case.
-
E.
hearsCasesAs
Indicates that one judicial body or judge reviews and adjudicates cases originating from another court or jurisdiction.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349cd7c148190aa99192b126d1527 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71fbecabc8190956d708dbf2d2c48 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71cc8074c81909ae09bea2acf1a09 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:02 a.m.