Triple
T34529756
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Illinois attorneys |
E886502
|
entity |
| Predicate | canRepresentClientsIn |
P8814
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Illinois state courts |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Illinois state courts | Statement: [Illinois attorneys, canRepresentClientsIn, Illinois state courts]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: canRepresentClientsIn Context triple: [Illinois attorneys, canRepresentClientsIn, Illinois state courts]
-
A.
allowsRepresentationByLawyers
Indicates that one party permits or recognizes the right of another party to be represented by lawyers in a given context or proceeding.
-
B.
soughtToRepresent
Indicates an attempt or intention by one entity to act on behalf of, stand in for, or present the interests of another entity.
-
C.
legalRepresentation
chosen
Indicates that one entity formally acts on behalf of another in legal matters, such as providing counsel, advocacy, or defense within a legal system.
-
D.
hearsCasesOnBehalfOf
Indicates that one party conducts hearings or adjudicates cases in place of, or as a representative for, another party.
-
E.
areRepresentedAt
Indicates that one entity serves as a representative or delegate for another entity at a specific place, event, or context.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349cd7c148190aa99192b126d1527 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71fbecabc8190956d708dbf2d2c48 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71cc8074c81909ae09bea2acf1a09 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:02 a.m.