Triple
T34525824
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Section 61 of the Constitution of Australia |
E886394
|
entity |
| Predicate | dateEffectiveFrom |
P83226
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 1 January 1901 |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 1 January 1901 | Statement: [Section 61 of the Constitution of Australia, dateEffectiveFrom, 1 January 1901]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: dateEffectiveFrom Context triple: [Section 61 of the Constitution of Australia, dateEffectiveFrom, 1 January 1901]
-
A.
effectivePeriodStart
chosen
Indicates the date and time when a specified condition, status, or agreement becomes valid or goes into effect.
-
B.
lessEffectiveAt
Indicates that one entity has a reduced ability or lower level of success in performing, influencing, or achieving a particular action or outcome compared to another.
-
C.
decisionEffectiveDate
Indicates the date on which a particular decision becomes valid, operative, or officially takes effect.
-
D.
dateEnacted
Indicates the date on which a law, policy, or formal measure was officially put into effect or became legally operative.
-
E.
dateGranted
Indicates the specific date on which a right, status, or permission was formally conferred or approved.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349cd7c148190aa99192b126d1527 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71fb788ec8190a1afec0cfb77dfa5 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71cc8074c81909ae09bea2acf1a09 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:02 a.m.