Triple
T34518483
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States presidential system |
E886218
|
entity |
| Predicate | judicialReviewEstablishedBy |
P53035
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Marbury v. Madison |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Marbury v. Madison | Statement: [United States presidential system, judicialReviewEstablishedBy, Marbury v. Madison]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: judicialReviewEstablishedBy Context triple: [United States presidential system, judicialReviewEstablishedBy, Marbury v. Madison]
-
A.
judicialReviewBy
Indicates that a judicial body examines and evaluates the legality or constitutionality of an action, decision, or rule made by another authority.
-
B.
judicialReviewStatus
Indicates whether and how a decision, action, or law has been or can be examined, challenged, or ruled upon by a judicial authority.
-
C.
hasConstitutionalReview
chosen
Indicates that an authority or body has the power to examine and judge the conformity of laws or actions with a constitution.
-
D.
layJudgeSystemIntroduced
Indicates that a lay judge system, involving non-professional citizens in judicial decision-making, has been introduced.
-
E.
judiciaryAct
Indicates that an entity is involved in, established by, or otherwise directly related to a specific judiciary act or piece of judicial legislation.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349ccc290819089d8e82698e53cb6 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7234bcaa48190ac970759d34e254a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:28 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72155c48881909bd40b9aa3febd5a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:20 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:01 a.m.