Triple

T34516721
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Château de Beynac E886169 entity
Predicate controlledSideDuringHundredYearsWar P197862 FINISHED
Object French side LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: French side | Statement: [Château de Beynac, controlledSideDuringHundredYearsWar, French side]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: controlledSideDuringHundredYearsWar
Context triple: [Château de Beynac, controlledSideDuringHundredYearsWar, French side]
  • A. controlledByDuringCivilWar
    Indicates that one party exercised control or authority over another specifically during a civil war period.
  • B. warPeriod
    Indicates a time span during which a state of war or armed conflict is ongoing between parties.
  • C. sideInSiegeOfLille
    Indicates that an entity participated as a side or belligerent in the Siege of Lille.
  • D. controlledByAfter1798Battle
    Indicates that one entity came under the control or authority of another entity as a result of a battle that took place in or after the year 1798.
  • E. partOfHistoricalConflict
    Indicates that one entity participated in, belonged to, or was involved as a component of a larger historical conflict or war.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349ccc290819089d8e82698e53cb6 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69feb342994081909481ec8ec5d44928 completed May 9, 2026, 4:08 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69feb046e4e48190b96649aa28529cc9 completed May 9, 2026, 3:55 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69feb3419158819082f4666077535ca9 completed May 9, 2026, 4:08 a.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:01 a.m.