Triple
T34498552
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Shapley–Curtis debate |
E885682
|
entity |
| Predicate | arguedBy |
P175527
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Harlow Shapley |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Harlow Shapley | Statement: [Shapley–Curtis debate, arguedBy, Harlow Shapley]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: arguedBy Context triple: [Shapley–Curtis debate, arguedBy, Harlow Shapley]
-
A.
arguedUnder
Indicates that one entity presented arguments or conducted a legal case under the supervision, authority, or guidance of another entity (such as a mentor, attorney, or judge).
-
B.
arguedWith
Indicates that one entity engaged in a verbal dispute or disagreement with another entity.
-
C.
argumentBy
chosen
Indicates that one entity presents, states, or supports a claim, position, or point of view made in another entity (such as a text, speech, or discussion).
-
D.
arguesThat
Indicates that one entity presents reasons or justification in support of a specific claim, position, or proposition held about another entity or topic.
-
E.
arguesFrom
Indicates that one entity presents reasoning, evidence, or justification starting from another entity (such as a premise, assumption, or position) to support a conclusion or claim.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349cafcec8190997b45b3fdc16c27 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f71fb1ab3881908e2f7c0e6f23db49 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:13 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f71cc6397881909aaad37a9daa8a7e |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:01 a.m.