Triple
T3449015
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | 2009 Oregon–Oregon State football game |
E72746
|
entity |
| Predicate | marginOfVictory |
P39190
|
FINISHED |
| Object | 4 points |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: 4 points | Statement: [2009 Oregon–Oregon State football game, marginOfVictory, 4 points]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: marginOfVictory Context triple: [2009 Oregon–Oregon State football game, marginOfVictory, 4 points]
-
A.
marginOfVictoryElectoralVotes
Indicates the difference in the number of electoral votes between the winning and losing candidates or parties in an election.
-
B.
finalRoundMargin
chosen
Indicates the point or score difference between competitors in the final round of a contest or competition.
-
C.
popularVoteMargin
Indicates the difference in the number or percentage of popular votes received by two candidates or options in an election.
-
D.
approvalVoteMargin
Indicates the numerical difference between the number of approval votes received and a comparison threshold or opposing votes in a decision or election.
-
E.
wonBy
Indicates that a contest, game, or competition is decided in favor of a particular participant or side.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85b05c848190b7a28ceec2bd7b74 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adba71f4a4819089d08b871cc9b16f |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:05 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adae0255b48190a9069f7871c7a012 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:16 p.m.