Triple
T34474830
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Asungor |
E885002
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasISO639Type |
P179656
|
FINISHED |
| Object | living language |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: living language | Statement: [Asungor, hasISO639Type, living language]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasISO639Type Context triple: [Asungor, hasISO639Type, living language]
-
A.
haveISO639Code
Indicates that a language or linguistic entity is associated with a specific ISO 639 standardized language code.
-
B.
hasISO6393Code
Indicates that a language or linguistic entity is associated with a specific ISO 639-3 three-letter language code.
-
C.
hasISO639MacrolanguageCode
Indicates that a language entity is associated with a specific ISO 639 macrolanguage code that represents a broader language grouping.
-
D.
hasISO639_5Code
Indicates that a language or language group is associated with a specific ISO 639-5 code that identifies it within the ISO 639-5 language classification standard.
-
E.
hasISO639LanguageCodeForMajorLanguage
Indicates that an entity is associated with a primary or major language identified by a specific ISO 639 language code.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349c880408190ade571c471ab154a |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f7238172748190b8cd340ad1f4ba80 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72155c48881909bd40b9aa3febd5a |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:20 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69f72349f1108190b6a06758ab2f40bb |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:28 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2:01 a.m.