Triple
T34460910
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Nʉmʉ Tekwapʉ |
E884635
|
entity |
| Predicate | instanceOf |
P0
|
FINISHED |
| Object | Comanche language |
C10973
|
CONCEPT FINISHED |
How this triple was built (1 step)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
CD
Concept disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target class: Comanche language Context triple: [Nʉmʉ Tekwapʉ, instanceOf, Comanche language]
-
A.
Arapaho language
The Arapaho language is an Algonquian language traditionally spoken by the Arapaho people of the Great Plains, now primarily in Wyoming and Oklahoma, and is the focus of ongoing revitalization efforts.
-
B.
Coahuiltecan language
The Coahuiltecan language is a hypothesized group of indigenous languages once spoken by various small, nomadic tribes in what is now southern Texas and northeastern Mexico, many of which are now extinct and poorly documented.
-
C.
Tanoan language
The Tanoan language is a constructed Austronesian-inspired language designed for the fictional island nation of Tanoa, featuring its own phonology, grammar, and vocabulary to support immersive world-building.
-
D.
Southern Athabaskan language
chosen
A Southern Athabaskan language is a member of the Athabaskan branch of the Na-Dené language family spoken primarily in the Southwestern United States and northern Mexico, characterized by complex verb morphology and tonal or pitch-accent features.
-
E.
Pueblo language
A Pueblo language is any of the indigenous languages historically and presently spoken by the Pueblo peoples of the Southwestern United States, each with distinct linguistic structures and cultural significance.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (1 batch)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349c73a94819094dfcf50d00620b8 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2 a.m.