Triple
T34456233
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | United States–Luxembourg relations |
E884510
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasAllianceFramework |
P133749
|
FINISHED |
| Object | North Atlantic Treaty |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: North Atlantic Treaty | Statement: [United States–Luxembourg relations, hasAllianceFramework, North Atlantic Treaty]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAllianceFramework Context triple: [United States–Luxembourg relations, hasAllianceFramework, North Atlantic Treaty]
-
A.
hasAllianceFocus
Indicates that an entity is oriented toward, prioritizes, or concentrates its efforts on maintaining or developing an alliance relationship with another entity.
-
B.
involvesAlliance
chosen
Indicates that there exists a cooperative or strategic alliance relationship between the referenced entities.
-
C.
hadTechnicalAllianceWith
Indicates that two entities formed a cooperative relationship focused on sharing or collaborating on technical knowledge, resources, or capabilities.
-
D.
allianceCompatibility
Indicates that two or more entities are suitable or well-matched to form or maintain an alliance based on their respective attributes, goals, or constraints.
-
E.
allianceStatus
Indicates the formal or informal cooperative relationship between entities, such as whether they are allies, neutral, or adversarial.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349c73a94819094dfcf50d00620b8 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fd783fed9c81909e792702636c4f1f |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:44 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fd7788e63c81909de22fdafcfe41c0 |
completed | May 8, 2026, 5:41 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2 a.m.