Triple

T34449861
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Ngāti Korokī Kahukura E884333 entity
Predicate hasAncestralArea P90583 FINISHED
Object Cambridge NE NERFINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Cambridge | Statement: [Ngāti Korokī Kahukura, hasAncestralArea, Cambridge]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasAncestralArea
Context triple: [Ngāti Korokī Kahukura, hasAncestralArea, Cambridge]
  • A. hasSiblingArea
    Indicates that one area is a sibling of another area, meaning they share the same parent area and are at the same hierarchical level.
  • B. alsoHasAncestry
    Indicates that an entity possesses an additional ancestral lineage or heritage beyond its primary recorded ancestry.
  • C. hasAncestralLand chosen
    Indicates that an entity possesses land inherited from its ancestors or traditionally associated with its lineage.
  • D. hasAncestralIsland
    Indicates that an entity has a specific island from which its ancestors originated or to which its lineage is historically tied.
  • E. hasAncestralTo
    Indicates that one entity is an ancestor of another, existing in an earlier generation within a lineage or heritage chain.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69f349c607688190b553539d14901a35 completed April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69fd2839880c819099a7a89783f2270e completed May 8, 2026, 12:03 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69fd23dc5da48190ae8ba08947d34956 completed May 7, 2026, 11:44 p.m.
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2 a.m.