Triple
T34442504
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | PEP 647 TypeGuard |
E884133
|
entity |
| Predicate | definesSyntaxElement |
P197373
|
FINISHED |
| Object | TypeGuard[X] return annotation |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: TypeGuard[X] return annotation | Statement: [PEP 647 TypeGuard, definesSyntaxElement, TypeGuard[X] return annotation]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: definesSyntaxElement Context triple: [PEP 647 TypeGuard, definesSyntaxElement, TypeGuard[X] return annotation]
-
A.
definesSyntax
Indicates that one entity specifies or determines the formal structure, rules, or grammar by which another entity is expressed or interpreted.
-
B.
explainsSyntaxElement
Indicates that one entity provides an explanation or clarification of the syntax or structural role of another element.
-
C.
definesElement
Indicates that one entity specifies or determines the nature, structure, or identity of another entity as its defining element.
-
D.
syntaxElement
Indicates a relationship where something functions as a syntactic unit or component within a larger grammatical or structural expression.
-
E.
definesDirective
Indicates that one entity specifies or establishes a directive that another entity is expected to follow or implement.
- F. None of above. chosen
Provenance (4 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349c548d88190978e2a82502c03d0 |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fe8ddf70e48190a917eb9e8f7b6966 |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:29 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fe87ef94dc81909bb00ec8d6de9bcd |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:03 a.m. |
| PDg | Predicate description generation | batch_69fe8dde8d008190b03dc0f97618073c |
completed | May 9, 2026, 1:29 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 2 a.m.