Triple
T3442563
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Finnish Sign Language |
E72598
|
entity |
| Predicate | hasOwnGrammar |
P12378
|
FINISHED |
| Object | true |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [Finnish Sign Language, hasOwnGrammar, true]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: hasOwnGrammar Context triple: [Finnish Sign Language, hasOwnGrammar, true]
-
A.
hasGrammar
Indicates that an entity possesses, follows, or is associated with a particular system of grammatical rules or structure.
-
B.
hasKnownGrammar
Indicates that an entity is associated with a grammar whose structure and rules are already defined or understood.
-
C.
hasDistinctGrammar
chosen
Indicates that the subject’s grammar system is different in structure or rules from that of the object.
-
D.
hasOwnPhonology
Indicates that an entity possesses its own distinct phonological system or set of sound patterns, separate from those of other entities.
-
E.
hasGrammarDifferenceFrom
Indicates that two linguistic items differ from each other in their grammatical form, structure, or rules of usage.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69ad85b05c848190b7a28ceec2bd7b74 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69adba28ec448190a6a07c5f16235fe3 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 6:04 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69adae0255b48190a9069f7871c7a012 |
completed | March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m. |
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:16 p.m.