Triple
T34409704
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | BAZL |
E883220
|
entity |
| Predicate | equivalentAbbreviationFrench |
P119333
|
FINISHED |
| Object | OFAC |
—
|
NE NERFINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: OFAC | Statement: [BAZL, equivalentAbbreviationFrench, OFAC]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: equivalentAbbreviationFrench Context triple: [BAZL, equivalentAbbreviationFrench, OFAC]
-
A.
correspondsToAbbreviationInFrench
chosen
Indicates that one entity is the full form or expression for which the other entity serves as the abbreviation in French.
-
B.
equivalentFrenchPostNominal
Indicates that one entity has a corresponding or matching French post-nominal form equivalent to that of another entity.
-
C.
alternativeAbbreviation
Indicates that one term serves as an alternative shortened form or acronym for another term.
-
D.
correspondsToAbbreviationInGerman
Indicates that one entity is the full form or concept for which the other entity serves as the corresponding abbreviation in the German language.
-
E.
isFrancophoneCounterpartOf
Indicates that one entity serves as the French-speaking or French-language equivalent or counterpart of another entity.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f349c1f2208190a09a489bb8b2719d |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:23 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69f72ad38a208190b4bdc828297f86ad |
completed | May 3, 2026, 11 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69f72a0243988190a43b8ea22457cd30 |
completed | May 3, 2026, 10:57 a.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 1:59 a.m.