Triple

T3440078
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject DVB-T E72542 entity
Predicate supportsSingleFrequencyNetworks P48290 FINISHED
Object true LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: true | Statement: [DVB-T, supportsSingleFrequencyNetworks, true]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: supportsSingleFrequencyNetworks
Context triple: [DVB-T, supportsSingleFrequencyNetworks, true]
  • A. hasBroadcastFrequency
    Indicates that an entity operates or transmits at a specified broadcast frequency.
  • B. hasCarrierFrequency
    Indicates that an entity (such as a signal or transmission) is associated with a specific carrier frequency at which it is transmitted or modulated.
  • C. supportsWiFiStandard
    Indicates that one entity is compatible with and able to operate using a specified Wi-Fi communication standard defined by another entity.
  • D. frequencyBand
    Indicates the specific range of frequencies within which a signal, measurement, or phenomenon is defined or operates.
  • E. supportsNetworkingModel
    Indicates that one entity provides compatibility with, or implementation of, a specified networking model for another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ad85af50288190a854b76653deee6f completed March 8, 2026, 2:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69adb9f833e88190b5e813f115621a5f completed March 8, 2026, 6:03 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69adae00ad588190bef24373b58a2e1a completed March 8, 2026, 5:12 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69adaed74ecc8190b74dc70ab59a3e1c completed March 8, 2026, 5:16 p.m.
Created at: March 8, 2026, 3:16 p.m.